Alliance for Affordable Energy
  • Home
  • Who
  • What
    • Consumer Protection and Education >
      • Regulate Our Pipelines
      • Health Impact Assessment
    • Clean Energy >
      • Renewable & Clean Portfolio Standard
      • Transmission
    • Energy Efficiency >
      • EEFA
    • GS4GND
    • Past Work
  • How
    • New Orleans City Council >
      • Council Actions
    • New Orleans Dockets >
      • UD-22-05 Hurricane Ida Costs
      • UD-22-04 Demand Solutions
      • UD-22-03 Battery Storage
      • UD-22-02 100% Renewable
      • UD-22-01 Storm Reserve
      • UD-21-03 Resilience
      • UD-21-02 Zeta Cost Recovery
      • UD-21-01 Winter Storm Uri
      • UD-20-02 IRP (2021)
      • UD-19-01 RPS
      • UD-18-07 ENO Rate Case
      • UD-18-02 EV Charging
      • UD-18-01 Smart Cities
      • UD-17-04 Reliability
      • UD-17-03 IRP (2018)
    • LA Public Service Commission >
      • LPSC 2022 Election
      • Engage with the LPSC
    • Lawsuits & Appeals
    • Climate Initiative Task Force
  • News
    • The Watchdog
    • People's Power Hour
    • MISO Soup
    • Hurricane Ida
    • Events Calendar >
      • AAE House Party
  • Learn
    • Glossary
    • Timeline
    • Reports
  • Get Involved
    • Support
    • Newsletter
    • Intern and Volunteer >
      • Wimpelberg Intern Fellowship
    • Contact Us

The Watchdog

A blog on energy matters in Louisiana!

Update from the Latest Louisiana Public Service Commission Meeting

7/25/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
At the latest LPSC meeting, it was decided that Acadian Consulting would be hired to collaborate with the Commission on the EPA’s proposed carbon emission plan. Below is a detailed report on the decision, provided by the Cruthirds Report. The Cruthirds Report is a detailed newsletter concerning regulatory developments in the energy industry. It is a must-read for anyone interested in energy policy in the Southeast United States. These informative and detailed reports provide timely insights on the energy industry. To subscribe to this report click here.

About David Cruthirds
David is licensed to practice law in the state of Texas, which enables him to appear before state public utility commissions in states throughout the southeast. David graduated cum laude from South Texas College of Law in Houston, where he was a member of the South Texas Law Review. David earned his MBA from Houston Baptist University, and combines his extensive experience with his legal and business acumen to provide value-added legal and regulatory consulting services to his clients. David gained widespread recognition for his knowledge and insights into the operation of competitive energy markets during his 6 years with Dynegy Inc., where he was Vice President and Regulatory Counsel.

To learn more about David Cruthirds and his work in the energy industry, please click here.


R-33253 : Louisiana Public Service Commission, ex parte In re: The United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Proposed Rule on Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Existing Fossil-Fuel Fired Electric Generating Units under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act
7/10/2014: Acadian Consulting/Dismukes hired to work on EPA carbon emissions rule – The Louisiana PSC voted 4-1 (Campbell voting no) during its July 9, 2014 B&E meeting to hire David Dismukes and Acadian Consulting to assist staff with its review of the EPA’s proposed carbon emissions rule.  Staff issued RFP 14-13 on June 6, 2014, and received two proposals.
  • Acadian Consulting Group submitted a bid that consisted of Task 1 (preparation of comments and follow-up comments) for $75,090; Task 2 (federal litigation against the EPA) for $40,790; and Task 3 (help develop State Implementation Plan) for $119,370.  The total bid for all three tasks was $235,250 in consulting fees and $1,417 in expenses.  http://www.acadianconsulting.com
  • London Economics International submitted a bid that consisted of Task A (cost-benefit analysis of the rule) for $57,525 and Task B (litigation support to challenge the rule) for $124,350 for a total bid of $181,875 (includes expenses not to exceed $7,500).  London also submitted a bid of $30,000 for an optional macroeconomic impact analysis.
Executive Counsel Brandon Frey said both firms were qualified, so staff did not make a recommendation.  Frey noted Acadian’s bid for Task 3 was unsolicited, so the commission would need to clarify whether Task 3 was included if Acadian’s bid was selected.  Similarly, London’s bid to perform a macro-economic study was outside the scope of the RFP.  Chairman Skrmetta made a motion to accept Acadian’s low bid for Tasks 1 and 2, but not for Task 3.  He said they could address Task 3 if necessary.  No opposition was voiced, and it was so ordered.

Public comments overlooked, so vote conducted again (with similar results) – The commission moved to and handled another matter (Exhibit 8) before it was discovered that Casey DeMoss Roberts with the Alliance for Affordable Energy had submitted a request to provide public comments on the EPA rulemaking.  Roberts apparently completed and submitted the request to comment, but the request was not brought to Chairman Skrmetta’s attention until after the commission had voted and moved on.  Skrmetta returned to Exhibit 7 and the EPA rulemaking to allow Roberts to provide her comments.

Roberts began by expressing frustration that public comments were supposed to be accepted before matters are voted on, noting the commission had already voted to hire Acadian.  Roberts and Skrmetta had a short exchange about how her request was overlooked, with Skrmetta apologizing for the snafu.  Roberts said the Alliance wants to contribute to the development of the commission’s position on the EPA’s proposed carbon emission rules.  She said the Alliance’s research shows that only 12% of Louisiana’s power is generated from coal.  She said the Alliance was confused by the EPA’s recommendation that Louisiana needed to reduce its carbon emissions by 40%, so the Alliance researched the issue and determined the 40% reduction would only apply to a subset of the generation in Louisiana.

Commissioner Campbell pointedly asked if Roberts and the Alliance had any concerns about Acadian Consulting and David Dismukes.  Roberts was initially hesitant, but conceded the decision to hire Acadian and Dismukes did raise concerns from the Alliance’s perspective.  She cited the Alliance’s and others ongoing challenge of the commission’s decision to hire Acadian and Dismukes to work on the comprehensive cost-benefit study of solar power and net metering.  (Docket X-33192)

Campbell noted he didn’t vote to hire Acadian for the net metering docket, expressing frustration with the Alliance’s criticism of that decision because the Alliance didn’t note Campbell’s opposition.  Campbell asserted Dismukes has a conflict of interest because of his past work for oil companies.  He shares the Alliance’s concerns about Acadian, but he wants the Alliance to get its story straight.

Roberts noted she was troubled by the altercation Dismukes was involved in when someone tried to serve him with a subpoena.  She said the decision to hire Dismukes was causing stakeholders to lose confidence in the commission’s process.  She urged commissioners to look at the net metering issues from the solar industry’s perspective, noting companies were going out of business because of the situation in Louisiana, asserting that wasn’t the right direction to be going.  She urged commissioners to be sensitive to all stakeholders’ concerns, and to consider the various parties’ motivations.

Holloway counters – Commissioner Holloway quickly countered that Louisiana had given the solar industry “everything” it asked for.  Holloway then asked if the Alliance opposed natural gas and gas-fired power generation.  Roberts said no, clarifying the Alliance “isn’t an environmental group.”  Holloway was shocked by that comment in light of the Alliance’s involvement in numerous environmental issues and cases, asking Roberts “what in the hell” the Alliance is if they aren’t an environmental group.  Roberts said the Alliance is for “affordable energy” as well as for consumer independence and choice.

Roberts said the net metering cost-benefit study is supposed to determine whether there are any subsidies.  If subsidies are found, solar customers should be required to pay their fair share.  But if not, the commission needs to recognize the full value and net benefits from solar power and net metering.  Holloway contended the solar industry’s growth may stop when the legislative subsidies end in 2017.  Roberts acknowledged solar growth may be slowing, but countered solar is growing even in states without any programs.  She cited the work being done in Georgia, noting the Tea Party supports solar on the basis of individual freedom and independence.

Holloway switched gears, asserting stakeholders are being unfair to Acadian and Dismukes.  He said people shouldn’t assume Dismukes is biased against solar, asserting the firm wouldn’t have been hired if the commissioners didn’t have confidence in it.

Commissioner Angelle followed up on Roberts’ observation that only a portion of Louisiana’s generation would be subject to the EPA’s rule.  He wondered whether the 40% target could be more significant because it would be measured against a smaller portfolio of generation.  Roberts acknowledged the EPA’s proposal is confusing, saying she expects continued analysis and dialogue between now and when comments are due in October.  Roberts said most of the emission reductions would come from nine specific plants, including four coal-fired plants.  She said the costs would be spread across a large number of ratepayers, so the overall impact on rates should be modest.

Angelle said it sounded like the proposed rule could be a “death penalty” for those plants.  Roberts acknowledged that could be the case, but contended those plants are old and might be shut down soon anyway.  She noted the EPA suggested the plants be converted to more efficient natural gas-fired plants.  She also noted new nuclear and energy efficiency were part of the EPA’s suggested compliance strategies.  She also said the EPA didn’t give proper credit on some issues, contending they can convince the EPA to lower its target by presenting a compelling case.

Angelle said he wanted to know the ultimate impact of the rule on ratepayers.  Roberts said the electric utilities’ pending IRP cases would be the perfect proceedings to address those issues.  The IRP cases can help determine the least-cost approach to meet the EPA’s targets.  She reiterated her belief that the issues can be managed without major impacts on ratepayers, but contended the state needs to diversify its generation base, including support for “home-grown” industries like solar.  Angelle thanked Roberts for her efforts to dig into the rule, and he looks forward to working with her on the issues.  He appreciated her digging into the issues and bringing new information to the commission’s attention.

Accolades for everyone’s demeanor – Commissioner Boissiere acknowledged the concerns about Acadian and Dismukes before commending Roberts for taking a “rational and reasonable approach.”  He said she addressed some issues that some people didn’t want to hear about, and did so in a calm, reasonable way.  He also expressed appreciation for commissioners treating her courteously in return, an apparent reference to previous public witnesses that weren’t treated very respectfully.  Boissiere said he was proud of her and proud of the commission for hearing and considering her views, noting she raised issues staff hadn’t identified.  He said her efforts were helping educate staff and commissioners.

Chairman Skrmetta said he appreciated Roberts’ help, but complained about receiving an email from an Alliance member that asserted Skrmetta was trying to “destroy solar.”  He said the commission’s cost-benefit study is designed to identify the relative costs and benefits of solar, contending the Alliance was misleading people.  He acknowledged he is a “public figure,” so people can say just about anything they want about him.  Nonetheless, that kind of factual inaccuracy hurts the Alliance’s credibility.  Roberts apologized, noting the Alliance discourages personal attacks.  Skrmetta reiterated the objective of the study is to find the right rate structure, so the net metering caps can be eliminated.

Skrmetta said he has had his own conversations with the EPA, citing the unknown factor about what will be considered.  He said the proposed rule’s focus is on CO2 emissions, so it will affect natural gas-fired generation as well as non-power producing industrial facilities.  He said the lack of fines or penalties in the rule was very surprising because there wouldn’t be much motivation for the states to comply.  He thinks there will be significant price increases, citing his discussions with DOE Secretary Ernest Moniz about the expected reduction of coal-fired generation before he became DOE secretary.  He said Louisiana has some of the lowest rates in the country, but high consumption leads to high bills and a lot of power generation.  He said part of the EPA’s strategy is to discourage consumption by increasing rates.

Skrmetta also addressed the decision to hire Dismukes, asserting the commission hires consultants and lawyers based on facts.  He noted reports prepared by outside consultants are subject to public vetting and comments, and aren’t just accepted by the commission.  Skrmetta noted he disagrees with the views of some of the commission’s outside consultants, asserting it would be hard to hire anyone if commissioners had to agree with all of the consultants’ views.

Reconsider and vote again – Chairman Skrmetta wanted to make sure the vote to hire Acadian/Dismukes couldn’t be challenged because of the failure to accept public comments before the vote, so he moved to reconsider the question.  Commissioner Campbell seconded, and no one objected to the reconsideration.  Skrmetta re-urged his original motion to accept Acadian’s bid for Tasks 1 and 2, and defer a decision on the proposal for Task 3.  Commissioner Holloway seconded.  Campbell said he was opposed, asserting Dismukes is too close to the oil industry and can’t be objective.  Skrmetta’s motion to hire Acadian and Dismukes passed by a 4-1 vote, with Campbell voting no.
0 Comments




Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012

    Categories

    All
    Alexandria Lia
    ALI
    ALI Meiner
    Andrew Wiseman
    Anniversary
    Bia Assevero
    CalGreen
    CCS
    Charles Rice
    Clean Energy
    CLECO
    CLECO FAQ
    CLECO Sale
    CLECO Sale Denied
    CLECO Stock
    CLECO Stock Prices
    CLECO Takeover
    Climate Change
    Clyde Holloway
    CO2
    Coastal Restoration
    Corruption
    Cost
    David Roberts
    Decoupling
    Dirty Energy
    Education
    Elections
    Energy
    Energy Efficiency
    Energy Policy
    Energy Smart
    Entergy
    Entergy New Orleans
    Environmental Risks
    EPA
    FERC
    Gas Plant
    Georgetown
    Government
    Grand Gulf
    Green Building
    Grid Failure
    GSREIA
    Gulf Of Mexico
    Health Risks
    Hurricane
    Hurricane Sandy
    Industrials
    Infrastructure
    IRP
    Land Loss
    Land-Use
    LA Public Service Commission
    LEED
    Liquid Air
    Louisiana
    Louisiana Public Service Commission
    LPSC
    MACQUAIRE
    Mayor's Office
    MISO
    Natural Gas
    New Iberia
    New Orleans City Council
    News
    NRDC
    Nuclear
    Oil & Gas Leases
    People Power
    Pipelines
    Power Grid
    Power Outages
    Power Plant
    Public Interest
    Regulation
    Reliability
    Renewable Energy
    RENEWABLE ENERGY POLICY NETWORK FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
    Resiliency
    Resolutions
    RTO
    Rulemaking
    Sacrifice Zones
    Sea Level Rise
    Solar
    Storage Solutions
    Subsidies
    SWEPCO
    TED Talks
    The Town Walk
    Town Hall Meetings
    Transmission
    Utilities
    Vicki Arroyo
    Watchdog
    Water Conservation
    Water Use
    WDSU
    Wetlands
    WWL Radio

    RSS Feed

Intern & Volunteer
If you want to be a frontline soldier on environmental protection, social justice, or environmental racism, come to Louisiana” –Gary Groesch, Founder of AAE
Calendar
View our events calendar ​for important upcoming community events and public meetings!
Support our work- ensure fair, affordable, and environmentally responsible energy for all.
501(c)3 IRS Notice

Alliance for Affordable Energy
Phone: (504) 208-9761
4505 S Claiborne Ave
New Orleans, LA 70175

Copyright © 2022 · Alliance for Affordable Energy
  • Home
  • Who
  • What
    • Consumer Protection and Education >
      • Regulate Our Pipelines
      • Health Impact Assessment
    • Clean Energy >
      • Renewable & Clean Portfolio Standard
      • Transmission
    • Energy Efficiency >
      • EEFA
    • GS4GND
    • Past Work
  • How
    • New Orleans City Council >
      • Council Actions
    • New Orleans Dockets >
      • UD-22-05 Hurricane Ida Costs
      • UD-22-04 Demand Solutions
      • UD-22-03 Battery Storage
      • UD-22-02 100% Renewable
      • UD-22-01 Storm Reserve
      • UD-21-03 Resilience
      • UD-21-02 Zeta Cost Recovery
      • UD-21-01 Winter Storm Uri
      • UD-20-02 IRP (2021)
      • UD-19-01 RPS
      • UD-18-07 ENO Rate Case
      • UD-18-02 EV Charging
      • UD-18-01 Smart Cities
      • UD-17-04 Reliability
      • UD-17-03 IRP (2018)
    • LA Public Service Commission >
      • LPSC 2022 Election
      • Engage with the LPSC
    • Lawsuits & Appeals
    • Climate Initiative Task Force
  • News
    • The Watchdog
    • People's Power Hour
    • MISO Soup
    • Hurricane Ida
    • Events Calendar >
      • AAE House Party
  • Learn
    • Glossary
    • Timeline
    • Reports
  • Get Involved
    • Support
    • Newsletter
    • Intern and Volunteer >
      • Wimpelberg Intern Fellowship
    • Contact Us