Alliance for Affordable Energy
  • Home
  • Who
  • What
    • Consumer Protection and Education >
      • Regulate Our Pipelines
      • Health Impact Assessment
    • Clean Energy >
      • Renewable & Clean Portfolio Standard
      • Transmission
    • Energy Efficiency >
      • EEFA
    • GS4GND
    • Past Work
  • How
    • New Orleans City Council >
      • Council Actions
    • New Orleans Dockets >
      • UD-22-05 Hurricane Ida Costs
      • UD-22-04 Demand Solutions
      • UD-22-03 Battery Storage
      • UD-22-02 100% Renewable
      • UD-22-01 Storm Reserve
      • UD-21-03 Resilience
      • UD-21-02 Zeta Cost Recovery
      • UD-21-01 Winter Storm Uri
      • UD-20-02 IRP (2021)
      • UD-19-01 RPS
      • UD-18-07 ENO Rate Case
      • UD-18-02 EV Charging
      • UD-18-01 Smart Cities
      • UD-17-04 Reliability
      • UD-17-03 IRP (2018)
    • LA Public Service Commission >
      • LPSC 2022 Election
      • Engage with the LPSC
    • Lawsuits & Appeals
    • Climate Initiative Task Force
  • News
    • The Watchdog
    • People's Power Hour
    • MISO Soup
    • Hurricane Ida
    • Events Calendar >
      • AAE House Party
  • Learn
    • Glossary
    • Timeline
    • Reports
  • Get Involved
    • Support
    • Newsletter
    • Intern and Volunteer >
      • Wimpelberg Intern Fellowship
    • Contact Us

The Watchdog

A blog on energy matters in Louisiana!

Whatever Happened to the Show Cause Order?

12/8/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture

​Whatever Happened to N.O. City Council Docket Number UD-16-01?
Picture

If you’ve been following all of the excitement at the New Orleans City Council Utility Committee over the last few months, you’re probably aware that the City’s electricity provider Entergy New Orleans (ENO) has been very busy! It is in the process of wrapping up the 2015 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), has applied to restructure into a Texas company, and has also applied to construct a 250 Megawatt Combustion Turbine (CT) natural gas power plant. However, these action packed dockets are not the only ones worthy of the public eye. In fact, the docket that could inform the outcome of the IRP and CT, docket number UD-16-01, the Show Cause Order, seems to have fallen to the wayside. So, the question is – what happened and what will happen next?

As a quick refresher, docket number UD-16-01 was opened on July 14, 2016 by an order initiating a “show cause proceeding.” Show cause orders are generally used by Courts to compel parties to present evidence as to why a court should or should not take a specific action. In the case of this Show Cause Order, the City Council is seeking information in order to determine whether ENO was prudent in its decision making, and the information provided on a range of operations concerns. However, the Council did not specify what actions it would take as a consequence of whether ENO provided sufficient evidence to convince the Council its actions were prudent. Instead, the Council resolved that pending the close of a discovery period in January of 2017, it would make a further determination on the “most appropriate future course of action”.

(Source: ACEEE.org)

What Is It All About?

In initiating this show cause docket, the Council displayed concern regarding the course of action ENO has taken in four particular areas of operation: the integrated resource planning, its proposed CT plant, a gas infrastructure rebuild, and storm hardening measures. The first two, though separate issues, are related. However, the gas re-build and storm hardening plans are separate issues from the IRP and the CT plant. Which  of these areas of operation was the City Council concerned enough to open an inquiry into the utility’s chosen courses of action?
IRP

Over the course of the 2015 IRP process, stakeholders, including the Alliance, have been active participants in technical conferences and in filings within the docket. Stakeholders from across the board have raised concerns numerous times about the inputs used by ENO in its modeling software for the IRP. In particular, the Alliance and others took issue with the use of outdated cost assumptions for renewable resources, and the inadequate economic benefits given to demand side management (DSM) programs, as well as the disregard of the historic performance of existing DSM programs in the New Orleans area.
​
The Council recognized stakeholder frustration at the continued disregard of their positions and the unwavering decision of ENO not to incorporate these concerns into their IRP modeling.  As a result, one of the things required of ENO to satisfy the show cause order was to address all of the concerns that had previously been disregarded.

In addition to stakeholder concerns, the Advisors took issue with ENO’s refusal to provide requested information. In particular, in a set of discovery questions the Advisors sought information regarding the ICF International and the Demand Side Management study conducted for the IRP. ENO at first refused to turn over the requested information claiming it was not in their control or custody. The Council believes that as ENO relies on third-party consultants in its planning process, that the information requested should be discoverable to ensure transparency of the proceedings and was ordered to turn over the requested information.  

Finally, the Council raised its own concerns about the change in size of ENO’s preferred CT portfolio. In the early drafts of its final IRP, ENO called for CT technology that had only 194 MW of capacity. However, by the time the final IRP was submitted the capacity had increased to a 250 MW CT. No explanation was included with this increased size, which the Council sought to obtain through the show cause order.
CT Plant

In addition to the increased size of the CT plant, there was a substantial amount of concern raised by stakeholders and members of the New Orleans East community who had not been notified or engaged during ENO’s planning of the facility. Moreover, in its application to build the CT plant, ENO alluded to the fact that it already found and contracted with a company to build the CT plant. This action contributed to a perceived finality that caused alarm with both members of the New Orleans community and with Councilpersons. Through the show cause order, the Council sought to ensure that ENO was proactively engaging the community about the costs and benefits of the proposed plant.
Storm Hardening

As many New Orleanians are well aware, it is fairly common to experience loss of power. This is even more frequent during storms and hurricanes. In 2015, the Council instructed ENO to develop plans to ensure that its electrical distribution system be “hardened” in order to prevent major outages. This is called “storm hardening”. The plan that was ultimately submitted by ENO was deemed “woefully inadequate” by the Council, in particular because it found that ENO’s distribution system was compliant with national standards and only proposed enhanced operation and maintenance practices. In the order, the Council looked to Florida Power and Light and the efforts that the utility company had made to harden their system against strong Florida storms. Ultimately, the Council found that seventeen months after beginning the process to get a comprehensive storm hardening plan, they had received very little information of substantive value.
Gas Infrastructure Rebuild

Finally, the Council has been seeking information from ENO about its Gas Infrastructure Rebuild program that has been operational since the early years following Hurricane Katrina. While ENO has replaced 328 miles of salt-water inundated gas pipes throughout the City since 2007, the company has also indicated that all of the inundated pipe will need to be replaced. In the show cause order the Council requested that ENO’s plans to replace these pipes beyond the first quarter of 2017 be produced, at the time the proceedings were initiated these plans had not been made available to the Council nor had the Council been provided with a date as to when they would be. As a result of the proceeding these plans were submitted promptly.
So What Next?

Early in the docket, August 15, 2016, to be exact, the Alliance submitted comments regarding the show cause order. In particular, the Alliance recounted the challenges it and other stakeholders experienced during the 2015 IRP process, requested that a thorough investigation into alternative resources both in regards to the CT application and a new round of the Integrated Resource Process intended to end in 2018, and ultimately addressed the ongoing debate in the utility world of whether the traditional utility model provides the best results for ratepayers and utilities alike.  Also early in the docket was an in-depth back and forth of discovery questions. Most of the discovery questions were to ENO, but some were from ENO to intervenors, including the Alliance.

ENO submitted the evidence it thought sufficient to address the concerns of the Council in a filing on September 29, 2016. ENO’s filing  failed once again to address stakeholder concerns and instead fixated on procedural technicalities that the Company itself has not observed. This lack of information resulted in a letter written by the Advisors to ENO. The letter detailed the Advisors continued dismay at ENO’s lack of self-awareness in the IRP process. In particular, the Advisors were upset that instead of addressing the many concerns of stakeholders as it was instructed to do, ENO sought to explain why it had not considered stakeholder positions previously. Additionally, the Advisors concluded that the information explaining the   size increase  of 56 mw of its CT plant still had not been provided.

That being said, the Advisors have since issued comments in the IRP docket stating that what ENO has produced up to this point is the best plan we have, and it should therefore be approved.
​
At a utility meeting on November 2016, the show cause order was not discussed at all. There is another utility meeting approaching on December 14, and the Alliance hopes the show cause order will be addressed. However, it may not be until the new year when the discovery period comes to an end that any resolution regarding UD-16-01 is reached. Unfortunately, by that time all intervenor testimony will have been submitted in the CT docket, and all that will be left is the Advisor testimony and ENO’s rebuttal testimony. Will it be too late for intervenors to have sufficient information on the CT and why ENO chose to increase its size? If the Council approves the IRP as the Advisors have recommended, even though the company still refuses to address stakeholder concerns in a constructive manner, will this set a precedent that rewards ENO for digging its heels in? The Alliance cannot say what the outcome of the show cause proceeding will be. However, it hopes that whatever the outcome that ENO is reminded that its obligation is to serve the City of New Orleans, as guided by the regulatory body of the Utility Committee, and that operating behind a corporate veil is intolerable.​
0 Comments




Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012

    Categories

    All
    Alexandria Lia
    ALI
    ALI Meiner
    Andrew Wiseman
    Anniversary
    Bia Assevero
    CalGreen
    CCS
    Charles Rice
    Clean Energy
    CLECO
    CLECO FAQ
    CLECO Sale
    CLECO Sale Denied
    CLECO Stock
    CLECO Stock Prices
    CLECO Takeover
    Climate Change
    Clyde Holloway
    CO2
    Coastal Restoration
    Corruption
    Cost
    David Roberts
    Decoupling
    Dirty Energy
    Education
    Elections
    Energy
    Energy Efficiency
    Energy Policy
    Energy Smart
    Entergy
    Entergy New Orleans
    Environmental Risks
    EPA
    FERC
    Gas Plant
    Georgetown
    Government
    Grand Gulf
    Green Building
    Grid Failure
    GSREIA
    Gulf Of Mexico
    Health Risks
    Hurricane
    Hurricane Sandy
    Industrials
    Infrastructure
    IRP
    Land Loss
    Land-Use
    LA Public Service Commission
    LEED
    Liquid Air
    Louisiana
    Louisiana Public Service Commission
    LPSC
    MACQUAIRE
    Mayor's Office
    MISO
    Natural Gas
    New Iberia
    New Orleans City Council
    News
    NRDC
    Nuclear
    Oil & Gas Leases
    People Power
    Pipelines
    Power Grid
    Power Outages
    Power Plant
    Public Interest
    Regulation
    Reliability
    Renewable Energy
    RENEWABLE ENERGY POLICY NETWORK FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
    Resiliency
    Resolutions
    RTO
    Rulemaking
    Sacrifice Zones
    Sea Level Rise
    Solar
    Storage Solutions
    Subsidies
    SWEPCO
    TED Talks
    The Town Walk
    Town Hall Meetings
    Transmission
    Utilities
    Vicki Arroyo
    Watchdog
    Water Conservation
    Water Use
    WDSU
    Wetlands
    WWL Radio

    RSS Feed

Intern & Volunteer
If you want to be a frontline soldier on environmental protection, social justice, or environmental racism, come to Louisiana” –Gary Groesch, Founder of AAE
Calendar
View our events calendar ​for important upcoming community events and public meetings!
Support our work- ensure fair, affordable, and environmentally responsible energy for all.
501(c)3 IRS Notice

Alliance for Affordable Energy
Phone: (504) 208-9761
4505 S Claiborne Ave
New Orleans, LA 70175

Copyright © 2022 · Alliance for Affordable Energy
  • Home
  • Who
  • What
    • Consumer Protection and Education >
      • Regulate Our Pipelines
      • Health Impact Assessment
    • Clean Energy >
      • Renewable & Clean Portfolio Standard
      • Transmission
    • Energy Efficiency >
      • EEFA
    • GS4GND
    • Past Work
  • How
    • New Orleans City Council >
      • Council Actions
    • New Orleans Dockets >
      • UD-22-05 Hurricane Ida Costs
      • UD-22-04 Demand Solutions
      • UD-22-03 Battery Storage
      • UD-22-02 100% Renewable
      • UD-22-01 Storm Reserve
      • UD-21-03 Resilience
      • UD-21-02 Zeta Cost Recovery
      • UD-21-01 Winter Storm Uri
      • UD-20-02 IRP (2021)
      • UD-19-01 RPS
      • UD-18-07 ENO Rate Case
      • UD-18-02 EV Charging
      • UD-18-01 Smart Cities
      • UD-17-04 Reliability
      • UD-17-03 IRP (2018)
    • LA Public Service Commission >
      • LPSC 2022 Election
      • Engage with the LPSC
    • Lawsuits & Appeals
    • Climate Initiative Task Force
  • News
    • The Watchdog
    • People's Power Hour
    • MISO Soup
    • Hurricane Ida
    • Events Calendar >
      • AAE House Party
  • Learn
    • Glossary
    • Timeline
    • Reports
  • Get Involved
    • Support
    • Newsletter
    • Intern and Volunteer >
      • Wimpelberg Intern Fellowship
    • Contact Us